// You can set default Consent Mode right after the UET tag
top of page

FCA car finance update (30 March 2026): what it means for you

  • Writer: The Claims Guide
    The Claims Guide
  • Apr 13
  • 4 min read

The FCA has now confirmed its long-awaited car finance compensation scheme. If you had a car, van or motorbike on finance between 2007 and 2024, there’s a good chance you could be owed money. It is reported that around 12.1 million agreements could be eligible, with an average scheme payout of around £829 per claim through the FCA scheme, though other routes may seek to get more.


Here’s a simple breakdown of what’s changed, what others are saying, and what it means for your options.


What the FCA has announced (simple summary)

The FCA has confirmed a large-scale compensation scheme for people affected by hidden commission in car finance deals.

In simple terms:

  • Around 12.1 million car finance agreements could be affected

  • The FCA estimates an average payout of about £829 per agreement through their scheme

  • Total compensation could run into billions of pounds

  • Many customers may be contacted proactively by lenders, rather than needing to complain first

  • The scheme is designed to make compensation broader and easier for consumers overall, though some commentators believe it undervalues claims.

In short: this is one of the biggest consumer compensation schemes in recent years, and millions of people could benefit.


What does this mean in practice?

If you were affected by hidden commission on your car finance, you may be entitled to compensation.

However, there are two important things to keep in mind:

  • The £829 figure is an average, not a guarantee

  • It is based on each agreement, not each person

So if you’ve had more than one car on finance, your total payout could be significantly higher.

That is one reason this matters so much. Many people have had more than one agreement over the years, and many still have not checked whether they were affected.


What are experts and the media saying?

Now that the initial announcement has settled, a clearer picture is emerging.


Martin Lewis and MoneySavingExpert

Martin Lewis has highlighted just how significant the announcement is, describing it as a mass redress scheme affecting millions. MoneySavingExpert has focused heavily on making the process understandable and practical for consumers.


But importantly, Martin Lewis has also made clear that:

  • you do not have to accept the FCA payout

  • you can choose to go to court instead

  • and in some cases, you may get more through the courts, although legal fees may reduce what you keep

That is an important point, because it changes how some people are now thinking about their next step.


Wider media reaction

A key theme in wider coverage is that the FCA scheme is designed to be broad, practical and efficient, but not necessarily to maximise every individual payout.

That means the scheme may be a strong baseline for many people, but it may not always reflect the full value of every claim. That is why the discussion has increasingly shifted from simply whether compensation is coming to which route may lead to the best outcome.


FCA scheme vs court claims: what’s the difference?

Here is the main decision many people are now looking at.


Option 1: FCA scheme

  • Likely simpler for most people

  • Average payout around £829 per agreement

  • May involve less effort up front


Option 2: Court claim

  • Requires a legal route

  • Can take longer

  • May result in a higher payout

This second option has become one of the biggest talking points since the announcement.


Why some people are choosing the court route

This is where things get interesting.

The FCA has effectively set a more standardised level of compensation. But real cases can vary a lot.

For example:

  • some agreements involved higher levels of hidden commission

  • some customers may have paid far more than others

  • some people had multiple agreements over the years


Because of that, court claims can sometimes lead to higher payouts than the FCA average.

Martin Lewis has been careful to point out exactly that: the FCA scheme is likely to be easier for most people, but it does not necessarily mean it will deliver the highest possible payout in every case.


Real-world example: higher payouts through claims

The lawyers we work with, HD Law, have reported an average payout of £1,846.23 per claim up to 31st July 2025. That is materially higher than the FCA’s average figure of about £829,


For an estimation of what you should be owed, click here


And that matters even more when you remember that many people have had more than one finance agreement.

So while the FCA scheme may be simpler, some claimants may decide it is worth exploring whether a court route could lead to more.


So what should you do?

At this stage, it is not necessarily about making a final decision immediately.

It is about understanding your position first.

The key questions are:

  • Were you affected?

  • How many agreements did you have?

  • Which route might make the most sense for you?

That is why the easiest first step is simply to check whether you are eligible.


The easiest first step: check if you’re eligible

Many assume checking will be complicated. They think they will need paperwork, agreement numbers, or old documents.

In reality, checking can be much easier than people expect.

  • You only need some basic details

  • You do not need your agreement in front of you

  • It only takes a couple of minutes to get started


You can check in 60 seconds here


Once you know where you stand, you can decide whether the FCA route looks right for you, or whether it is worth exploring a claim that could lead to a higher payout.


Final takeaway

The FCA announcement is a big step forward, but it is not the whole story.

Millions may now be due compensation and the FCA route is designed to be easier. But it may not always represent the highest payout available.

As Martin Lewis and others have pointed out, some people may decide that going through the courts is worth considering, especially where there is the potential for a higher individual outcome.

So the smartest move right now is to simply to check whether you are eligible and how many agreements you may have had.



You do not need to use a claims management company to make your complaint to your lender. If your complaint is not successful you can refer it to the Financial Ombudsman Service yourself for free.

 
 
 

Comments


TheClaimsGuide.com is a trading style of Cambridge Corporate Consultants Limited (Company number 01329796). Cambridge Corporate Consultants Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (124851). ICO number ZB224521

Registered office: 65 Church Street, Harston, Cambridge, CB22 7NP, United Kingdom. Registered In England & Wales

TheClaimsGuide.com acts as an introducer for potential clients/customers to UK legal professionals or Claims Management Companies who are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. TheClaimsGuide.com's relationship with its partnered claims management companies is limited to that of a business partnership with no common ownership or control rights exist between us. We may receive payment from our partner once a compensation claim is successfully paid out to you. Please note, we will not charge you for our service.

bottom of page